Tag Archives: Cold War

«Endeavor to change regime in Russia – nearly official explanation for sanctions»

Dmitry Evstafyev, born 1966, graduated from College of Asian and African Studies of Moscow state University and pre-doctorate courses Institute of USA and Canada Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences. Since 1992 – engaged in political and security studies. Since 2001 – actively worked in business PR, risk assessment, and strategic consulting business. Worked with and in major Russian industrial corporations. Since 2013 – Professor of Chair of Integrated communications of National Research University – Higher School of Economics.

Romanian-flag– Mr. Evstafyev, you said in one of your recent article that between Putin’s speech at the Yalta and Sochi (Valdai) are notable differences. But I think it’s normal, also the target audience was different. Am I wrong ? Give our readers some details about you opinion.

Evstafyev– You are both right and wrong. You are right from the point of view of immediate audience. It is definitely foreign politicians and political scientists. You are wrong from the point of view of the major audience. That is Russian “ruling class” and its associates. Everybody in Russia for some time was waiting for “signals” from President. Signals came and they were quite strong. They reflected the new – more difficult – political situation and integrity of the “inner circle”. These are predominantly “internal” messages. They also reflect absence of radical foreign policy plans. But that is also an important “internal” message.
In general one should understand that for current Russian leadership at this point of their political life “domestic” (in a wide meaning of the term) is much more important that “foreign”. That is why the “Valdai” speech was so widely covered in Russia. Much wider than “Yalta” speech.

– You say that Russia should take advantage of the current window of opportunity and initiate a systemic reform of the government and political stage. Do you think that we will witnesses to significant changes in the two plans in the next few months?

– I would draw you attention to my other article – “Chances for development”/ ”Шансы на развитие”  (published in gazeta.ru, November 3, 2014). Some important points were outlined there. If we will not witness a drastic change including reshuffle of the upper echelons, the political crisis in late 2015 – early 2016 is inevitable. The “Valdai” speech shows that Kremlin at least sees that threat. To what extent Kremlin is able and ready to act – that is a big question to which no one knows the answer. But the pressure for “less liberal” and more “industrial” (we call that “anti-Kudrin”) economic agenda grows. The problem is that the worse the economic situation is and the more pressure the West puts on Russia the smaller the chance for liberals in the government to survive.


– In April, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung has published an article entitled “Putin should prepare for a long Ice Age period”. Now, the same journal released a column signed by John Kerry, that seems an invitation to calm down the tensions between US and Russia. Course, sanctions go on, but what do you think ? Will have a new Cold War or is time to back the business as usual ?

– There would probably be not a Cold War in a traditional sense since there is little (but some and that is important ideological content) and no global bipolarity. But the confrontation has already started. The West in general does not conceal that its target is to change a regime in Russia with – let’s say – trans-constitutional means. That was an explicit – nearly official – explanation for sanctions. That definitely “means war” (like in Buggs Bunny cartoons). That could be called “hybrid Cold War” but in general the Western idea that it could try to remove regime in Moscow simultaneously trying to cooperate with it where the West wants (jihadists, Iran, non-proliferation) looks ingenuously stupid. War means war. And for Russian economy and policy the “long ice” period (10 years I think) would be not good. It would be great.

– The presence of President Putin at APEC and G20 Summit changed something regarding bilateral relations between Russia and the West countries ?

– No. The mid-term political line is determined and no one seems to be ready to pull back. The earliest time for changes – early spring. I do not think that any chances for dialogue would emerge in spring but who knows…… The starting point is clear – West should unequivocally recognize that the Crimea belongs to Russia, but I do not think that it is ready yet. We can wait…..

– Oil and gas market has been “pretty turbulent” in recent months. Chart.ashxYou also work on the business consulting field. Give me an advice, please: if I am a Chinese businessman, should I buy shares to Rosneft?

– If you are Chinese and you are a businessman – yes, buy. If you are US or EU and you are an “investor” (you are engaged in speculative transactions at the fund market) – sell. If you are real US businessman – buy. If you are real businessman from EU – sell to Chinese or Indian. There will be very little space (if any) for EU-based business in fuel and energy sphere in Russia if the current political trend continues. There will be, though, space for others.

I ask you about because actually, we notice that “Gazprom”,“Rosneft” and “Lukoil” are considering re-placement of their shares on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong in Asian currencies. As the “Interfax” said, the topic was discussed last week at a meeting of Russian Ministry of Economic Development with its counterpart in Hong Kong as part of the APEC summit in Beijing. Do you think it’s a move with medium and longterm impact on oil and gas market?

– In a mid-term perspective – yes. In a sort term – no. At this time too little of operational and financial infrastructure in the Far East exists for these companies despite the fact that the recommendations to develop it were put on the table in early 2000s. It would take 2-3 years under current circumstances to develop it. After that the impact could and would start to grow.

– Finally, but not least important thing: how is perceived from Moscow the recent result of Romanian presidential election ?

Hardly noticeable. Interesting. Absolutely opposite situation here. At the local Moscow elections all who used “I-ph”, Facebook, Vkontakte as well as administrative resource lost. Heavily. Grass-roots. Interesting result. Much more attention to Moldova election. Moscow is not enthusiastic about Moldova division. In my understanding Moscow would prefers to maintain status-quo. But considering other issues – one more Moldova, one less Moldova – no big deal. People in Europe do not understand that they pushed Russians (most of them, excluding not very many selected personalities) beyond the “threshold of pain”. People think that the crisis and confrontation would be anyway. Than why we should be “nice”?

interview made by Gabriela Ionita

“Războiul rece s-a încheiat, însă competiția pentru spațiul cosmic a rămas” – interviu cu General-Maior Dumitru-Dorin Prunariu

– Ce vă fac nepoții, domnule general ?

– Nepoții…cresc mari și sănătoși într-o familie de aviatori cu tradiție și cu speranța noastră că această meserie va fi continuată. Cel puțin Andrei, nepotul cel mic, are acasă o escadrilă întreagă de avioane micuțe, pe care le aranjează meticulos la linia covorului și zboară cu fiecare, cunoscând deja toate figurile acrobatice posibile.

– Am început această discuție ceva mai informal, deoarece, deși e un moment aniversar (se împlinesc 30 de ani de la incursiunea dvs. în cosmos) și în general vi se cere să împărtășiți amintiri din trecut, eu aș vrea să vorbim mai mult despre prezent și viitor, și vreau să vă întreb cum credeți că va arăta domeniul explorării spațiale când nepotul dvs. cel mic, Andrei, va avea vârsta pe care o avea tânărul cosmonaut Prunariu când a zburat în spațiu ?

– Deci peste … 25 de ani…cred că peste un sfert de secol cosmosul și domeniul aferent acestuia va arăta puțin diferit față de cum arată acum la doar 50 de ani de cosmonautică pilotată. Să sperăm că atunci în viitor o misiune spre planeta Marte va fi deja efectuată, o misiune internațională, o misiune complexă. De asemenea cred că Luna va fi deja re-explorată și exploatată deja ca furnizor de resurse naturale. Omul va zbura departe, și nu doar omul ci și aparatele construite vor zbura mult mai departe, vor fi coborât deja pe asteroizi și vor fi făcut investigații complexe asupra compoziției materiei acestora care ne oferă informații esențiale asupra modului în care s-a format sistemul nostru solar. În plus, telescoape puternice vor fi pătruns mai departe, în inima universului și ne vor fi furnizat deja date suplimentare despre locul nostru în univers și evoluția sa.

– Care sunt în prezent principalele provocări tehnologice și de securitate a programelor spațiale civile și militare ?

– Dintotdeauna spațiul cosmic a avut o întrebuințare duală, civilă și militară. Inițial programele spațiale au fost dezvoltate cu intenții vădit militare, în primul rând pentru a culege informații despre potențialul inamic. Perioada Războiului Rece s-a terminat, dar competiția pentru spațiul cosmic, desigur într-o formă nouă, modernizată, a rămas. E drept că spațiul cosmic civil reprezintă un domeniu de reală cooperare internațională între toate puterile spațiale ale lumii și nu numai între ele, un domeniu în care problemele globale ale planetei se caută a fi rezolvate utilizând tehnologii spațiale. Zona militară însă este o zonă de competiție permanentă, o zonă în care marile puteri și superputeri încearcă să domine pentru a putea controla ceea ce se întâmplă pe pământ, pentru a controla economia lumii, pentru a asigura securitatea națiunilor lor oricând este necesar și împotriva oricui. Iar din această competiție inerent că apar și provocările. (text integral)

Published – Cadran Politic, May 2011

Putin responds:”Our feet are firmly planted and facing towards the future”

President Barack Obama heads to Moscow tomorrow promising a far-reaching effort to “reset” US-Russia relations that hit a post-Cold War low under the Bush administration.

But, Barack Obama set the stage with a pre-trip assessment that Mr Putin still had “one foot” planted in the Cold War. Hard to tell if it was just a statement or a pedestrian challenge. Certainly it was unconstructive to clamp reset the relationship between                    the two powers.

Obviously, the answer of Russian Prime Minister, with the style typical putinian did delight the media.

A extensive material about Obama’s visit to Moscow will be published in next edition of weeklypaper Top Business. Also, after published it will post on blog.